| 刘思明,侯雪娇,袁贺霞,阎新燕,周晶晶,焦敏,王婷婷,马静,沈媛,于鲁海.基于要素计点法的医院不同药师岗位评价指标体系的构建[J].中国药事,2022,36(6):679-689 |
| 基于要素计点法的医院不同药师岗位评价指标体系的构建 |
| Establishment of Evaluation Index System for Diff erent Pharmacists Positions in Hospitals Based on Point-factor Method |
| |
| DOI：10.16153/j.1002-7777.2022.06.011 |
| 中文关键词: 医院药师 岗位评价 要素计点法 层次分析法 岗位价值 |
| 英文关键词: hospital pharmacists post evaluation point-factor method analytic hierarchy process position value |
| 基金项目:新疆维吾尔自治区自然科学基金项目(编号 2019D01C139) |
| 作者 | 单位 | | 刘思明 | 新疆维吾尔自治区人民医院药学部,乌鲁木齐 830001 ；新疆维吾尔自治区临床药学研究所,乌鲁木齐 830001 | | 侯雪娇 | 新疆维吾尔自治区人民医院药学部,乌鲁木齐 830001 | | 袁贺霞 | 新疆维吾尔自治区人民医院药学部,乌鲁木齐 830001 ；新疆维吾尔自治区临床药学研究所,乌鲁木齐 830001 | | 阎新燕 | 新疆维吾尔自治区人民医院药学部,乌鲁木齐 830001 | | 周晶晶 | 新疆维吾尔自治区人民医院药学部,乌鲁木齐 830001 ；新疆维吾尔自治区临床药学研究所,乌鲁木齐 830001 | | 焦敏 | 新疆维吾尔自治区人民医院药学部,乌鲁木齐 830001 | | 王婷婷 | 新疆维吾尔自治区人民医院药学部,乌鲁木齐 830001 ；新疆维吾尔自治区临床药学研究所,乌鲁木齐 830001 | | 马静 | 新疆维吾尔自治区人民医院药学部,乌鲁木齐 830001 | | 沈媛 | 新疆维吾尔自治区人民医院药学部,乌鲁木齐 830001 | | 于鲁海 | 新疆维吾尔自治区人民医院药学部,乌鲁木齐 830001 ；新疆维吾尔自治区临床药学研究所,乌鲁木齐 830001 |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 1108 |
| 全文下载次数: 287 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 目的：构建医院8个药师岗位评价指标体系，为不同药师岗位绩效考核与二次薪酬分配提供科学依据。方法：运用要素计点法构建岗位指标评价体系，通过决策矩阵筛选指标，运用层次分析法和专家咨询法进行指标权重赋值，专家对指标权重群决策结果进行认可度评价。结果：通过决策矩阵，形成5个一级指标、22个二级指标的医院药师岗位评价指标，对于8个药师岗位评价指标权重，专家赋值结果均通过一致性检验。CR值分别为调剂药师岗0.0732、审方药师岗0.0757、临床药师岗0.0613、GCP岗0.0741、 实验药师岗0.0498、制剂生产岗0.0620、质控岗0.0769、助理岗0.0531。但专家组对各岗位评价指标权重赋值群决策结果认可度不一致，仅调剂药师岗专家认可度Kendall's W系数P＜0.05，GCP岗全部评价指标的变异系数＜0.25。结论：从第一轮岗位指标权重赋值结果及专家组对其认可度可知，岗位评价指标体系的构建具有可行性，其建立需要在完善专家培训的基础上进行。同时，本研究在第一轮专家咨询出现的问题，可供其他研究者参考规避。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| Objective: To establish the evaluation index system of eight pharmacists positions, so as to provide scientific basis for the performance appraisal and secondary performance distribution of different pharmacists positions. Methods: The post index evaluation system is constructed by means of point-factor method, the indexes are selected by the decision matrix. The weight of index was assigned by analytic hierarchy process and expert consultation method, and the experts evaluated the recognition of the decision-making results of the weight coeffi cients group. Results: Through the decision matrix, the post evaluation indexes of pharmacists with5 fi rst-level indicators and 22 second-level indicators were formed. For the weight indexes of 8 pharmacist post evaluation, the expert assignment results all passed the consistency test. The CR values were 0.0732 for dispensing pharmacist post, 0.0757 for prescription pharmacist post, 0.0613 for clinical pharmacist post, 0.0741 for GCP post, 0.0498 for experimental pharmacist post, 0.0620 for preparation production post, 0.0769 for quality control post, and the assistant post was 0.0531. However, the expert group's recognition of the weight coeffi cients evaluation of each post was inconsistent, and only the P value of Kendall's W of expert recognition of dispensing pharmacist post was less than 0.05. In addition, the variation coeffi cient of all evaluation indicators of GCP post was less than 0.25. Conclusion: From the fi rst round of post weight coeffi cients evaluating results and the recognition of the expert group, it could be concluded that the establishment of evaluation indicator system is feasible, which needs to be carried out on the basis of improving expert training. At the same time, the problems in the fi rst round of expert consultation of this study could be referred for other researchers to avoid. |
|
查看全文
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |
|
|
|