| 谢成.医院药品配送系统自动导引运输车的使用与效果评价[J].中国药事,2021,35(8):957-962 |
| 医院药品配送系统自动导引运输车的使用与效果评价 |
| Application and Effect Evaluation of Automated Guided Transport Vehicle in Hospital Drug Delivery System |
| |
| DOI：10.16153/j.1002-7777.2021.08.014 |
| 中文关键词: 药品运输车 自动导引车 配送时间 差错发生率 |
| 英文关键词: drug delivery cart automated guided vehicle (AGV) delivery time error rate |
| 基金项目: |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 653 |
| 全文下载次数: 299 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 目的：在不改变药品运输车外观及功能的情况下，通过对其进行简单的结构改造，并结合使用自动导引车(Automated Guided Vehicle，AGV)配送系统来完成药品的运送，提升工作效率，彻底解决偶发药品运输超载问题。方法：在药车一侧开孔洞后加装收纳方便的对接装置，并加挂医院现有的背负式AGV完成结构改造。进一步对比考察人工推送传统药车(人工组)和AGV导引药车(AGV组)的配送性能，对两组药车的药品配送时间、工作效率﹑药品损坏率及事故发生率等方面进行对比分析，评价改造后药车的配送性能。结果：整体而言，AGV组相比人工组配送时间明显缩短，差异有统计学意义 (P＜0.01)。人工组单次平均配送时间呈先减少后增加趋势，而AGV组单次平均配送时间呈持续减少趋势。AGV组药品损坏率低于人工组，事故发生率高于人工组，但差异均无统计学意义(P＞0.05)。 结论：本研究通过对药车进行的结构改造并加用医院现有AGV，利用较少的资源投入，获得了较大的收益。AGV导引的药车相比传统人工配送方法及配送时间明显缩短，但能否降低差错发生率需要在长期的实践中进一步考察。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| Objective: A simple structural transformation was carried out on the drug transport vehicle without changing its appearance and function. Combined with Automated Guided Vehicle (AGV) distribution system to complete the delivery of drugs, improve working efficiency and completely solve the problem of accidental drug overloading. Methods: The drug delivery cart was structurally transformed by drilling holes on the side of the medicine cart and installing a docking device for convenient storage, and the existing piggyback AGV of the hospital was trailed. The distribution performance of manual traditional drug delivery cart (Manual group) and AGV guided drug delivery vehicles (AGV group) were further compared and analyzed, which includes delivery time, working efficiency, damage rate of drug and accident rate of the drug delivery vehicles, and the distribution performance of the modified drug delivery vehicles was evaluated. Results: Overall, delivery time of AGV group was significantly shorter than that of Manual group (P＜0.01). The average single delivery time of Manual group decreased at first and followed by an increase, while that of AGV group kept decreasing. Damage rate of drug in AGV group was lower than that of Manual group, while the accident rate of cart was higher compared with that ofthe manual group. However, the difference was not statistically significant (P＞0.05). Conclusion: In this study, a greater benefit was obtained while less resource investment was utilized as a result of the structural transformation of drug delivery cart and the application of existing AGV in our hospital. Compared with the traditional manual distribution method, delivery time of AGV guided drug cart was significantly shortened, but whether the error rate could be reduced needs to be further investigated in the long-term practice. |
|
查看全文
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |
|
|
|