文章摘要
李佳,林炽雄,范玉华,何秋毅,闫佳佳,陈杰,陈孝.非ICU住院患者利奈唑胺的临床用药合理性调查[J].中国药事,2017,(3):328-336
非ICU住院患者利奈唑胺的临床用药合理性调查
Rationality Investigation of Linezolid in Clinical Application for Non-ICU Inpatients
投稿时间:2016-09-28  
DOI:10.16153/j.1002-7777.2017.03.016
中文关键词: 恶唑烷酮类抗菌药物  利奈唑胺  非危重症  合理用药  疗效调查  不良反应  非ICU  病例分析
英文关键词: oxazolidinone antibacterial  Linezolid  non-intensive critical care unitillness  rational drug use  efficacy survey  ADR  non-ICU  case analysis
基金项目:
作者单位E-mail
李佳 中山大学附属第一医院, 广州 510080
中山大学, 广州 510006 
 
林炽雄 嘉应学院, 梅州 514031  
范玉华 中山大学, 广州 510006  
何秋毅 中山大学附属第一医院, 广州 510080  
闫佳佳 中山大学附属第一医院, 广州 510080  
陈杰 中山大学附属第一医院, 广州 510080  
陈孝 中山大学附属第一医院, 广州 510080 frankwychen@hotmail.com 
摘要点击次数: 1309
全文下载次数: 528
中文摘要:
      目的: 评价中山大学附属第一医院非ICU住院患者使用利奈唑胺的临床合理性及其疗效和安全性,为非ICU科室的临床合理用药提供参考。方法:采用回顾性研究方法,选取我院非ICU科室2015年1月-2015年12月使用利奈唑胺注射剂或片剂的患者病例,根据药品说明书和相关指南,分析利奈唑胺的临床应用合理性,并统计有效率及不良反应发生率。结果:调查共纳入有效病例112例,其中用药合理为77例(68.75%),用药不合理35例(31.25%):用药无指征6例(5.36%),用药疗程不适宜15例(13.39%),联合用药不当11例(9.82%),8.04%的患者联用了4种以上抗菌药物。治疗结果痊愈72例,无效33例,因不良反应难以耐受停用5例,因缺药停用2例,临床治疗有效率为68.57%。用药后出现不良反应的有26例(23.21%)。结论:利奈唑胺在治疗非ICU科室患者的革兰氏阳性球菌感染时临床疗效较好,但存在不合理使用情况,使用过程中需关注其不良反应的发生。
英文摘要:
      Objective: To appraise the rationality of clinical use of linezolid in non-ICU departments, as well as its efficacy and safety. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted in patients treated with LZD injection or tablets between January 2015 and December 2015 from the non-ICU departments of a tertiary hospital in Guangzhou. The rationality of linezolid, the effective rate and incidence of adverse reactions (ADR) were analyzed, referring to the drug instruction and relevant guidelines. Results: Among the 112 patients included, there were 77 cases for rational use (68.75%) and 35 cases unreasonable (31.25%); among irrational drug use, there were 6 cases having no clear indications (5.36%), 15 cases with too long or too short duration of treatment (13.39%), and 11 cases of improper combination with other antibiotics (9.82%), 8.04% of which were involved in combination with more than four kinds of antibiotics. 72 patients were cured, while 33 were invalid; 5 were discontinued due to difficulty into tolerating ADR and 2 stopped using because of deficiency of drug, resulting in an effective rate of 68.57%. ADRs were observed in 26 cases (23.21%) after medication. Conclusion: There were irrational phenomena in clinical use of Linezolid at non-ICU departments, although it showed a relatively better therapeutic effect on Gram-positive bacteria infections. ADRs should be monitored closely when using linezolid.
查看全文   查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器
关闭