|
| 层次分析法在“两品一械”监管重点实验室评价指标权重确定中的应用 |
| Application of analytic hierarchy process in determination of the weight of evaluation indicator for Key Laboratories for the supervision of pharmaceuticals, cosmetics and medical devices in NMPA |
| 投稿时间：2019-05-05 修订日期：2019-07-11 |
| DOI： |
| 中文关键词: 重点实验室 评价 指标 层次分析法 权重 |
| 英文关键词: Key Laboratories, Evaluation, Indicator, AHP, Weight |
| 基金项目: |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 420 |
| 全文下载次数: 0 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 摘要：目的 应用层次分析法（analytic hierarchy process, AHP）确定国家药品监督管理局（简称药监局）药品、化妆品和医疗器械（简称两品一械）监管重点实验室评价体系各指标权重，为评价提供帮助。方法 在现有评价指标体系的基础上，依据评分细则中对各指标的重要性评分，构建判断矩阵，运用层次分析法确定一、二级指标权重。结果 基础条件、人才队伍、近五年内科学研究及成果、服务监管能力和社会贡献5个一级指标的权重分别为0.0646，0.0646，0.3579，0.3579和0.1549，模型具有较好的一致性和满意度，一级指标CI=0.014，CR=0.01，二级指标各项CI和CR值均＜0.1。结论 指标权重合理体现了各指标在重点实验室综合能力组成中的相对重要程度，为药监局重点实验室评估提供了量化的评价工具，有利于专家评分和实验室自评的尺度统一以及机构间的横向比较，具有较高参考价值。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| Abstract Objective: To determine the weights of the indicators in the evaluation system of the Key Laboratories for the supervision of pharmaceuticals, cosmetics and medical devices by the National Medical Products Administration(NMPA), applying the analytic hierarchy process(AHP), so as to provide assistance for evaluation. Method: Based on the existing evaluation indicator system, and the importance scores of each indicator in the scoring rules, judgment matrixes were constructed, and the weights of the primary and secondary indicators were determined by AHP. Results: The weights for the basic conditions, the talent team, the scientific research and achievements in the past five years, the competence for serving supervision and the social contribution were 0.0646, 0.0646, 0.3579, 0.3579 and 0.1549, respectively. The model had good consistency and satisfaction. CI was 0.014 and CR was 0.01 for the primary indicator, and the CI and CR values of the secondary indicators were all less than 0.1.Conclusion: The weights reasonably reflects the relative importance of each indicator in the comprehensive competence evaluation for key laboratories, and provides a quantitative evaluation tool, which is helpful for evaluation and comparison. |
|
View Fulltext
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |
|
|
|